The researchers reanalysed data collected in 115 previous studies comparing organic and conventional agriculture. They found that organic yields are about 19.2 percent lower than conventional ones, a smaller difference than in previous estimates. The study is published online in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
"In terms of comparing productivity among the two techniques, this paper sets the record straight on the comparison between organic and conventional agriculture," said the study's senior author, Claire Kremen, professor at UC Berkeley and co-director of the Berkeley Food Institute, according to a university statement. "With global food needs predicted to greatly increase in the next 50 years, it's critical to look more closely at organic farming because, aside from the environmental impacts of industrial agriculture, the ability of synthetic fertilizers to increase crop yields has been declining."
The researchers pointed out that the available studies comparing farming methods were often biased in favor of conventional agriculture, so this estimate of the yield gap is likely overestimated. They also found that taking into account, methods that optimize the productivity of organic agriculture could minimize the yield gap. They specifically highlighted two agricultural practices multi cropping (growing several crops together on the same field) and crop rotation that would substantially reduce the organic to conventional yield gap to 9 percent and 8 percent, respectively.
The yields also depended upon the type of crop grown, the researchers found. There were no significant differences in organic and conventional yields for leguminous crops, such as beans, peas and lentils.
"Our study suggests that through appropriate investment in agroecological research to improve organic management and in breeding cultivars for organic farming systems, the yield gap could be reduced or even eliminated for some crops or regions," said the study's lead author, Lauren Ponisio, a graduate student of environmental science, policy and management. "This is especially true if we mimic nature by creating ecologically diverse farms that harness important ecological interactions like the nitrogen fixing benefits of intercropping or cover cropping with legumes."
The researchers suggest that organic farming can be a very competitive alternative to industrial agriculture when it comes to food production.
"It's important to remember that our current agricultural system produces far more food than is needed to provide for everyone on the planet," said Kremen. "Eradicating world hunger requires increasing the access to food, not simply the production. Also, increasing the proportion of agriculture that uses sustainable, organic methods of farming is not a choice, it's a necessity. We simply can't continue to produce food far into the future without taking care of our soils, water and biodiversity."
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/followceleb.cms?alias=University of California,Proceedings of the Royal Society B,Organic farming,leguminous crops,Claire Kremen
Stay updated on the go with The Times of India's mobile apps. Click here to download it for your device.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Organic farming not too far behind conventional farming, says Berkeley study
Dengan url
http://uratrefleksi.blogspot.com/2014/12/organic-farming-not-too-far-behind.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Organic farming not too far behind conventional farming, says Berkeley study
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Organic farming not too far behind conventional farming, says Berkeley study
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar